Artistic Vision

It’s a right-brain kinda thing.

Reading assignments and art education—what’s a teacher to do?

Art History by Marilyn Stokstad (2nd ed.)I came home today from one of the most disappointing and frustrating days of my, as of yet, very short educational career. My students were tasked, last week to ready what is the introduction to Art History (2nd ed.) by Marilyn Stokstad. Although 17 pages, it’s packed with large photos and isn’t a huge drain on your intellectual resources. She does an admirable job communicating on a less-than-high-school level for high schoolers.

Sadly, the students complained from day until night about this assignment. First, let me say my kids are used to not being challenged in art class. Left to their own devices they would be happy doing a little craft and talking to their friends all period. They love to tell me how much better the “other” art teachers were that they’ve had at the school and gleefully run through the list of past preferred teachers. However, from what I’ve gather from talking to the teachers who are still at the school (turn over is exceptionally high), none of the teachers really did anything close to what should be covered in art history or art appreciation. The later teachers seem to have been worn down by the students to the point of letting them come up with their own projects with minimal oversight. And, I can see why!

I told the students I wanted simple notes taken (and attached to their packet) or that they could highlight the text of the xerox packet. Many said they didn’t understand what that meant. I explained that in college you’re going to be tasked with having to read chapters in a book. Your responsibility is to read it and a) take notes via pen/notebook or laptop or b) highlight what you believe to be relevant portions of the text. I deliberately left it open-ended since I didn’t want to walk them through it because the students will lazily not do the reading and wait for my before-the-test study guide.

Sadly, upon reviewing their packets—I told them they would receive a grade for their highlight/note-taking—I determined many of them were either not reading it but simply highlight pieces of the text at random, or they were reading it and not pulling out what they should have been. So, I spoke to my principal and vice-principal to seek their advice. In the end, they agreed with me that I should ditch giving them a formal study guide and re-read the article during class periodically stopping to ask them for feedback and what was salient about the short passage we just read together. That would serve as their study guide.

Well, the students in my first two classes weren’t having it. First period did poor with frequent interruptions and complaints and third period did even worse. I had to ask the VP to come down to remove two students. By the time she got there, other students had basically becoming just as talkative. I pulled her outside and we conferred. In the end, she recommended that they be held accountable for their behavior and told their notes would have to suffice and the test they were to be given on this material would take place as originally planned instead of two days later to accommodate the re-reading of the packet. The next period did better with only a couple of students periodically having side conversations.

In the final analysis, though, I know most of these students will fail this test. Not because the information wasn’t available to them, but because they don’t care and see it as being irrelevant to their life. One girl told me she just didn’t care because it wasn’t important to her; she wants to be a doctor and art is not relevant to her career. I tried to explain that in college (she’s in 11th grade), she’s going to have to read many things which she is going to feel the same way about. Just because you think you’re going to med school doesn’t mean everything is a) going to be medically-related, b) going to be interesting and c) going to be easy. These kids—even the seniors—seem very naive and I just don’t know how to break through to them.

Does anyone have any thoughts on how to handle some of the art history lessons I’ve got coming up? I know the students think that if they complain and cause enough problems I’ll just throw in the towel and only do hands-on projects. But, I refuse to do that.

Please send me your suggestions and comments.

12 Comments »

  erikatakacs wrote @

That’s a difficult situation you’re in. They’re obviously disinterested in art, but so were we 25 years ago about philosophy in grade 12. And then, this young teacher walked in, and just started talking without notes, references or books. His enthusiasm awakened our interest.
I’d say don’t give up, just try something different. Try to make it interesting by telling stories about great artists or works of art (by the way there’s a great blogger here who’s posting short stories about Renaissance painters, http://100swallows.wordpress.com/), show lots of pictures. Try something fun and silly with them, as if they were 6. Let them do an abstract while they’re blindfolded for example. Once they start having fun, and pay attention, and the complaints stop, slowly move on to more serious stuff. Let them critique a famous piece of art etc.
I don’t know if any of these makes sense or not, but please don’t throw in the towel. Good luck!

  100swallows wrote @

Let me, a former Latin teacher, sympathize with you. We aren’t alone. Pity the poor philosophy teacher and the history teacher, too (and the rest of them, while you’re at it). I think erika is right (thanks for the recommendation, erika!): you have to come through the back door: tell them about Leonardo’s experiments with flight or warfare, about Giotto’s circle, about Michelangelo’s carving method (the mummies in the box) or the agony of painting a ceiling. I guess you have to make those artists people before you can get the kids to look at their works. If you talk about colors and composition you will lose them immediately. Even showing them great pictures won’t work unless you tell them what to look at–but let it not be anything arty. I think one can never be too simple. My mistake was always that I shot over their heads, being misled by one or two bright kids in the class.

Is art a required subject? Of course it simply is NOT for everybody.

  JWP wrote @

Thank you BOTH for your thoughts. I very much appreciate it.

Working backwards … Yes, art is a required subject in that NJ requires you take at least one class before graduation. Because my school is small, the students inevitably don’t have much choice in electives so my class turns into a “forced” elective that most take more than once. Fortunately, I haven’t faced that yet. I’ll look through your site to give me some background on some of these artist stories, which I enjoyed reading when I popped by your site last night. I’m definitely up for trying. I have to say that I have tried painting artists as real people with real struggles but, so far, it’s fallen on many deaf ears.

You mention “showing them great pictures won’t work unless you tell them what to look at” but I’m not sure what you mean by that. Are you saying that I need to explain to them how to look at art?

Erika, thank you for the encouragement. A question for you, too. How do I keep students who are generally dismissive of art (because they think it’s a waste of time and silly) from dismissing it even more if I do something like an activity which could reinforce that attitude? Make sense?

  erikatakacs wrote @

It must be really tough to break that resistance. But the doctor will need to pick some prints for his office one day, and most of them will hang a picture or two in their homes. Ask them, how will they know what to pick? They won’t even know what they like, because they thought art was a useless subject back in high school.
Once I saw this documentary about a teenager and his mom. His mom was interested in art, he was not, but she somehow convinced him to take part in an art class with her as a therapy (there were some family issues). They were given a blank paper and some paint. They had to paint something, anything that they liked. He stared at the paper for quite some time, but then started painting a baseball stadium, the game he liked very much. The painting looked pretty good for someone who never really did it before, he was quite shocked he had it in him and got very enthusiastic about it. The wall of silence between him and his mom was broken.
You need to break that wall of resistance. I still think something fun would be your best tool. Maybe the example was childish. But Facebook is full of childish stuff and they’re all there and doing it. Speaking of Facebook, here’s another idea. What if they drew portraits of each other and then posted them on Facebook? That could awaken their interest. You could at least give it a try.

  JWP wrote @

Thanks for the story about the mom and son, Erika! I’ll be sure to use the example of buying prints for the doctor’s office too. That has many applications even with just buying art for the apartment or dorm they are going to have when they go to college! Good points all around.

  erikatakacs wrote @

I know what the future doctor’s answer would be. ‘I won’t need to do that, I’ll ask my assistant pick them for me’. And when she’ll pick some hideous prints he absolutely hates, he’ll think ‘I should have taken those high school art classes more seriously’. lol
You sound more hopeful already, JWP! Go get them! :) And don’t get discouraged if they don’t seem to react. Some of it will stick on them, I’m sure.

  100swallows wrote @

That sounds terrible, doesn’ t it–”explain to them how to look at art”? But on their own,most of them get so little out of a picture. Most need to be told what to see and what to think–even the smartest of them. That’s anyway natural. I show you a photo and say “look!”–you don’t know exactly what I want you to see unless I spell it out. Pictures need captions. Even newspaper clippings that friends send often leave you puzzled because your friends don’t say why they sent them or what they think is so noteworthy.I don’t think you should presume they see much. Probably your kids aren’t ready for a sophisticated analysis of the design or colors and you have to tell them stories about the artist or some feature of the painting that might amuse them.
It IS hard and few are successful, so chin up.

  JWP wrote @

LOL, Erika! You are SO right about the doctor and her secretary. Of course, some of the resistance is just teenagers being contrary. I mention to them every so often when they get a little snippy about how meaningless my class is that they would be living in very dull worlds without art. There would be no jewelry, clothing would be banal and plane, magazines would be filled with only words and pictures of the columnist, their iPods and cellphones would be less snazzy and generic in design, etc. They all recognize the validity of my statements but refuse to make the jump primarily because they are LAZY and don’t want to extend themselves. So, they fall back on lame excuses.

100Swallows … I actually just introduced them to description and while we joked around quite a bit (and a few of them failed the initial quiz I gave because they didn’t take it seriously), they have started picking of some of the rudiments of using pure descriptive language, without value statements. They have very limited lexicons so I’m starting off slowly to help use terms they know. We walked through one of the two works I had graded them on and I gave them a simple strategy on how to start and walk through describing a painting. This seemed to help most of them. We’ll see what tomorrow brings.

One student who failed and freaked out on me came back at the end of the day to apologize which I told him was very mature and very much appreciated. My goal in the art criticism work is merely to get them to think a little differently. I know most will not take much away from this, but I wanted to see what would happen since I hadn’t done this before on a formal basis.

You comment that I need to tell them a story or something about a feature of the artwork is VERY well said. We went over The Arnolfini Marriage by Van Eck and I told them that the woman was not pregnant – though all thought that she was. We then got off on a tangent about what cultural pressures women often endure to remain fashionable in society.

Oh, and BTW, even though the kids failed the first descriptive quiz. Those who failed were given the opportunity to redo the second painting description after we all walked through the first one. All of those grades jumped up to A’s.

Thanks again for the poignant commentary, guys!

  erikatakacs wrote @

Thanks for being a great teacher! I’m laughing because I’m thinking: it takes a global village to raise a digital-age, 21st century child. :)

  stonecyffer wrote @

Yes, help them to understand how to look at art! I have a similar age-group (college freshmen), and one thing that I’ve noticed they like is trying to identify the visual elements and principles of design as a group. You explain, for example, how to look for line. Then you show them a few images and let THEM find the lines. Same with trying to figure out how emphasis/focal point works. Sure, it seems obvious, but let them try to explain it in a work they’ve never seen before. It can be a game.

  JWP wrote @

Thanks for the “game” recommendation! I’m posting today about how some of my attitudinal changes have negatively impacted my perspectives on more fun activities like playing games. We just finished doing a rudimentary run through of the elements and principles of design in preparation for moving on to the next two steps of the art criticism model I’m using: analysis and interpretation. A game would be a good way to check for understanding. I’ll have to think through how I can introduce that over the next two days. Thanks again for your thoughts!

  stonecyffer wrote @

A game discussing elements and principles would be a great way to demonstrate how formal analysis works. You might even want to do what I do sometimes: project a large image of an at least somewhat abstract artwork. Divide the class into 4-5 groups. Give each group one element and one principle to work with. Then have them all report what they find. They do start making the connections between individual concepts and the overall analysis.


Your comment

HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>